Loading...

Federal Court sheds light on evidential requirements in enforcement of non-REJA foreign judgments

Arbitrate – yay or nay?

Construction contracts: no relief against government under section 7 of Covid-19 Act

Restricted from counterclaiming based on adjudication decision?

Failure to mediate before arbitration is question of admissibility, not jurisdiction

Adjudicator is Bias for Unreasonable Deadlines & Failure to Account for MCO Restrictions

Winding up petition based on adjudication decision under CIPAA – Court of Appeal reaffirms Likas Bay

CIPAA: clash of stay applications and enforcement orders

Challenging compensation for acquired land: high court is the final avenue

Hearsay Evidence in Expert Reports – General and Specific Hearsay

Statutory oppression action: apex court confirms that remedies may extend to directors and third parties

CIPAA: Only Qualified Advocates for Adjudications in East Malaysia?

Section 30 of CIPAA – A Road Less Travelled, Now Widened

A Contractor’s Claims in Adjudication against the Sub-Contractor

Housing Developers Beware – The Aftermath of PJD Regency Sdn Bhd v Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah & Anor

Oppression vs Derivative Actions: The Court’s Wide Discretion Maintained

The Right to Sue a Consultant – Who does it lie with?

Directorship of the Former Director of the Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC) is non-justiciable

COVID-19 Act – Helps or hurts?

COVID-19 & Construction Sites: Effects of CMCO on Extension of Time and Loss & Expense Claims

COVID-19 – Movement Control Order and its Effect on Construction Contracts

COVID-19: Legal Mechanisms for Companies and Individuals Facing Financial Distress

Embrace the storms of the Movement Control Order (MCO)

Covid-19 and the FIDIC Form of Contracts – The Impact of the Movement Control Order or Lockdown Order on Building Sites

Covid-19 – The Impact of the Movement Control Order on Building Sites

COURT RULED ON THE CHALLENGES TO THE AIAC AND STATUTORY ADJUDICATION

DOES CIPAA APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY – The decision of Bauer (M) Sdn Bhd v Jack-In- Pile (M) Sdn Bhd [2018] 4 MLJ 640

CIPAA ADJUDICATION – WHAT HAS CHANGED SINCE VIEW ESTEEM SDN BHD v BINA PURI HOLDINGS BHD