With the passing of the Arbitration (Amendment) Act 2024, Malaysia has restructured the Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC), replacing the Director with the President of the AIAC Court of Arbitration.
This shift centralizes decision-making in arbitration and adjudication appointments, but it also raises critical legal questions—does the President enjoy the same immunities as the former Director?
Our Partner, Mei Yee‘s latest article that’s published with the Current Law Journal (CLJ) examines the implications of this legislative change, the extent of immunities under international agreements, and the potential legal gaps that remain.
Read the full analysis here: